Men treat women as who they see women as being. We would be justified in banning a certain type of pornography e. One important dimension of the disagreement between those liberals who defend a right to pornography and those who think that liberals should be open to the legitimacy of censorship is empirical: I suppose one could admire Plato's desire to clean up theology by making it more logical, and then tying this to making the State more rational and thus better for the citizens.
There must be an answer that derives more fundamentally from the nature of reality. Other sexually explicit representations depict acts of violent coercion: Agamemnon in myth, a son of Atreus and brother of Menelaus; he was king of Mycenae and the leader of the Greek forces in the Trojan War.
It is a principle that continues to provide the dominant liberal framework for the debate over pornography and censorship. Inspired by more recent feminist arguments against pornography, some scholars argue that the liberal commitment to protecting individual autonomy, equality, freedom of expression and other important liberal values may in fact support a policy that prohibits certain kinds of pornography, rather than the permissive stance that liberals have traditionally favoured.
Surely anyone would prefer to profit by committing an act of injustice against another than to suffer as the victim of an act of injustice committed by someone else. In other words, they disagree about how the harm principle should be interpreted and applied.
But the ordinance was significant, not least for reconceptualizing the question of pornography in the public arena in feminist terms: A vital principle is at stake for liberals in the debate over pornography and censorship.
But, Dworkin suggests, we surely should not think that that this violates their right to freedom of speech: Far from making downtrodden victims of women, pornography may have a vital role to play in challenging traditional views about femininity and female sexuality and in empowering women, both homosexual and heterosexual, to shape their own identities as sexual beings.
Socrates does not seem very attractive in these sections. Poets cannot say that God is the author of evil, "God is not the author of all things, but of good only": Surely anyone would prefer to profit by committing an act of injustice against another than to suffer as the victim of an act of injustice committed by someone else.
Governments also have a responsibility to prevent citizens from harming themselves. But it is worth noting that there is an interesting fourth possibility.
But it might be that this ordinary conception, on reflection, turns out not to capture what is of moral and political interest and importance. Really, I find all of this insufferable.
Other feminist arguments focus on the related role pornography may play in restricting women's autonomy, by reproducing and reinforcing a dominant public perception of the nature of women and sexuality that prevents women from articulating and exploring their own conceptions of sexuality and of the good life.
Plato wrote the remainder of The Republic in an attempt to provide an adequate, satisfying answer to this question. After Book I, the entire dialogue is pervaded by an extended analogy between the justice of individual human beings and the that of an entire society or city-state.
In my Philosophy of Art course, we are discussing Plato’s philosophy of art, by means of selections from Statesman and Books 3 and 10 of The Republic, along with snippets from Ion, Phaedrus, and Symposium.
In The Republic, Plato makes a systematic case for censoring all arts. The task of the Platonic philosopher is to take up the “ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry” [b] and to. Censorship is the subject of several dialogues in The Republic, the major work of Greek philosopher Plato.
His stance is perhaps summarized in Book II of The Republic by the phrase that " literature may be either true or false ", i.e. true stories and fictions, Plato objects to the fictions as false. Lecture 24 - Censorship Overview. Professor Gendler explores some aspects of the question of what sorts of non-rational persuasion are legitimate for a government to engage in.
She begins with two modern examples that illustrate Plato’s view on state censorship. She next turns to the text itself and outlines in detail Plato’s argument that. May 05, · Hence, in debates over censorship and other forms of state regulation that restrict the liberty of individuals against their will, the burden of proof is always firmly on those who argue for censorship to demonstrate that the speech or conduct in question causes significant harm to others.
Censorship, Nadaff argues, is not merely a mechanism of silencing but also provokes new ways of speaking about controversial and crucial cultural and artistic events.
It functions philosophically in the Republic to subvert Plato’s most crucial arguments about politics, epistemology, metaphysics, and ethics.Plato censorship